Several initiatives are currently underway to rethink the way metropolitan areas are designed. This simulation modeling and analysis framework can provide a design planning and evaluation tool to assess several integrated mass transit paradigms such as busing, rail, and PRT-type (personalized rapid transport) networks to help identify and accelerate acceptance of the worthwhile investments.
The use of simulation as a decision-support tool could provide a measure of accountability that would help avoid or at least temper some of the larger controversies over the past century of rapid technological change. The history of our infrastructure has been peppered with some epic and ultimately costly battles over different modes of transfer, such as the turn of the century Edison - Tesla battle to establish AC or DC as the power delivery standard [27] or the politicized finger pointing over whether GM was duly responsible for taking control of streetcar operations in the 20s in order to dismantle them in favor of GM-manufactured buses [41,14]. Having detailed records of the simulations used to provide hard data on which broad policy decisions are based could help justify your decision later. With more exotic options pushed by several technology firms, we ought to determine the selection of major communications upgrades or transit systems based on available technical data, and not on which company has the best connections to the civil servants responsible for municipal decision making.
Ultimately, if this were to evolve into a fully-featured urban simulation tool, it could be used as a rapid prototyping environment for proposals to system changes big and small. When this functionality matures, a municipality might require a simulation-based analysis to accompany any new infrastructure proposal as part of a gateway approval process. As standard patterns are built up, the simulation framework may morph into a design tool, replete with a library of openly available blueprints, guidelines, and standards (as well as freely customizable sections) to that can be assembled to achieve development goals. Furthermore, as the process becomes automated, it might incorporate more direct civil input, turning review and evaluation of problem areas and proposals into something of an experiment with direct digital democracy governance, in which the citizens can interact as something like a hive mind. Or so goes the vision.
Applying a schedule optimizer ensures that we evaluate different transit
paradigms on a level playing field. Different transit schemes utilizing
rail, bus, and PRT styles of vehicle sizes and routing will get a fair
shake at providing the maximum theoretical performance possible given
the same physical construction constraints. Each mode of transit will
have some measure of routing intelligence that should reflect the
optimization computing power that should become more pervasive in the
near future. They would all operate with the benefit of an intelligent
central dispatch that characteristic of advanced transportation systems.
System operators will have the freedom to direct their fleet about the
network and pick up, transfer, and drop off groups of passengers as
necessary to meet passenger demand as quickly and efficiently as
possible with their existing resources. Mass transit vehicle fleets
will only be subject to the physical constraints of vehicle passenger
capacity, station berth / terminal / gate capacity, and the existence of
connective links between stations.
Rowin Andruscavage 2007-05-22